Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: Canon 17-55mm vs 24-70mm

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,156

    Re: Canon 17-55mm vs 24-70mm



    Quote Originally Posted by fyrcat


    I am a volunteer firefighter, so I need a lense on my camera for a quick shot when we first arrive to something exciting, that can capture just about anything in various lighting conditions.
    <div style="clear: both;"]</div>


    I've done plenty of fire scene photography. You really want the L on your camera for those conditions. When someone forgets to put the correct spin on a 5" LDH and a hose starts snaking around, you'll be glad it's the 24-70 on your camera. Reminds me of the many times that I'd go to training and put on my helmet/gloves/pants/boots every time. Folks would ask why, and I'd respond "for safety". Within five minutes, they'd see why, and then go do the same thing.
    We're a Canon/Profoto family: five cameras, sixteen lenses, fifteen Profoto lights, too many modifiers.

  2. #2

    Re: Canon 17-55mm vs 24-70mm



    helmet = fully sealed L lens


    gloves = fully sealed camera body


    pants = quality lens filter


    boots = everytime


    Safety as an analogy to cameras is a system, with no a single line defense. Forget any one, and you'll still be at significant risk. Sorry, I couldn't think of anything better for boots... [:P]


    I'm saving for thef2.8 70-200 for fast/low lightaction shots...the crop bodies are catching up andappear to be digging in deep...I love my 17-55mm. []

  3. #3
    Senior Member neuroanatomist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    3,918

    Re: Canon 17-55mm vs 24-70mm



    Quote Originally Posted by 2slo


    gloves = fully sealed camera body


    Cathy, just be aware that the XSi is not a weather-sealed body. Of course, a Ziploc bag with a couple of rubber bands will provide substantial protection.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,156

    Re: Canon 17-55mm vs 24-70mm



    Every firefighter knows there's no such thing as weather-sealed &lt;anything&gt;, and also can tell if something will survive the fireground with one glance. A Motorola indicator is usually a good start, but only if it was made for the fire service.
    We're a Canon/Profoto family: five cameras, sixteen lenses, fifteen Profoto lights, too many modifiers.

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    3

    Re: Canon 17-55mm vs 24-70mm



    I had a point and shoot fuji digital before the Rebel xsi, and it worked great for a quick down and dirty pic,especially when first arriving on a fire. I am an engineer, and many times I got yelled at to get to work as I snapped a couple of pictures...but when we were thru, all those snappy mouths came to me for copies of my pictures.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Fast Glass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Ferndale WA
    Posts
    1,188

    Re: Canon 17-55mm vs 24-70mm



    Quote Originally Posted by fyrcat
    all those snappy mouths came to me for copies of my pictures.

    Sotrue. LOL

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •