Hi


<span style="font-size: 9pt; color: black; font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif'; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;" lang="EN-GB"]Good thoughts about the 24-70mm f/2.8 L. I actually also think it could be an excellent choice. But as you point out - will I miss IS. I can see the good point in f/2.8 when it's for moving objects and bad light.
But IS is still good for my shaking hand <span style="font-size: 9pt; color: black; font-family: Wingdings; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-ascii-font-family: Verdana; mso-hansi-font-family: Verdana; mso-char-type: symbol; mso-symbol-font-family: Wingdings;" lang="EN-GB"]<span style="mso-char-type: symbol; mso-symbol-font-family: Wingdings;"]J<span style="font-size: 9pt; color: black; font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif'; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;" lang="EN-GB"]
Have actually newer tried to turn off IS on my ef-s 17-85mm.
70-200mm<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"] f/4 L is on the long list <span style="font-size: 9pt; color: black; font-family: Wingdings; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-ascii-font-family: Verdana; mso-hansi-font-family: Verdana; mso-char-type: symbol; mso-symbol-font-family: Wingdings;" lang="EN-GB"]<span style="mso-char-type: symbol; mso-symbol-font-family: Wingdings;"]J<span style="font-size: 9pt; color: black; font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif'; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;" lang="EN-GB"]<o></o>


<span style="font-size: 9pt; color: black; line-height: 115%; font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif'; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-bidi; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;" lang="EN-GB"]I have the possibility to tryout the 16-35mm L II and the 24-70mm L. So maybe I will evaluate the results first, plus hope for and announcement of a 24-70mm with IS.