Originally Posted by djzuk
Hope you have big rooms in your house, or are planning on shooting mainly closeups of your family. 70-200 is a little on the long side for shooting in typical rooms, IMO.
Originally Posted by djzuk
Hope you have big rooms in your house, or are planning on shooting mainly closeups of your family. 70-200 is a little on the long side for shooting in typical rooms, IMO.
Originally Posted by neuroanatomist
True, so I guess mainly compare the two options for tighter portraits. I'm thinking usually you'd want a flash in this case anyways... so f2.8 wouldn't be necessary. For now I'm leaning more towards the f4 IS... though I guess I don't need to worry about it until after my 10-22 purchase. Maybe by then the f2.8 IS will be around $1000 since the mark II version will be coming out.
Thanks for all of your advice.
Derrick