Canon wildlife lens?

[Sinh Nhut Nguyen]

For bird only, get the 400 f/5.6L ($1200)


For Macro, get the new 100 f/2.8L IS ($1100)


and that's about $2300


Nate,

[nickds7]

For bird only, get the 400 f/5.6L ($1200)


For Macro, get the new 100 f/2.8L IS ($1100)


and that's about $2300


Nate,

+1 for that, as long as 100mm gets you close enough for what you are doing...sounds like it though.

[Brendan7]

I've heard that the 2-stop IS of the 4/300 is first-generation and outdated and so not a factor when comparing it with the 5.6/400.


Thoughts??

[Daniel Browning]

I've heard that the 2-stop IS of the 4/300 is first-generation and outdated and so not a factor when comparing it with the 5.6/400.

Yes, the I.S. on the 300mm f/4 is marketed as "only" 2 stops, but that does not mean it is not a factor. For example:

• 300mm f/4 + 1.4X TC ISO 1600 1/125
• 400mm f/5.6 ISO 6400 1/500

There's a huge difference in noise between ISO 6400 and ISO 1600, even though it's "only" two stops.

[Mickw]

Ive got a 400 f5.6 and use it on my 1DS MK3. Wildlife moves so speed is the most inportant factor as is getting close. Dnt have an APS-C. This lens is a total joy in good light. You dont need IS as you shoot as fast as you can so handheld its light, great for panning, birds in flight its top for. Its tough, optically perfect and one of the most undersung lens's in Canons line up. It whups the 100-400 for image quality. That said you will miss some shots as its not a zoom. You work harder with primes as you need to move around a lot, its not weather sealed either.


But when the lights good and you get the shot its excellent. Im selling mine. Why? Because i got drunk, had acess to EBAY, a credit card and some fool sold me a 1 year old 500 f4 is L. And thats in a whole different league. Its so good id sell my wife to the devil if needed. Ok, maybe not but a kidney or two.


Mick