I've got the 70-200 f4L usm as well and it goes along very well with my new 17-55 f2.8 is usm. I had the budget problem as well And now I'm really pleased with what I bought. The combination of lenses forfills a lot of demands. And the quality is just perfect. The 17-55 doesn't let you down, it really delivers L-quality in my opinion.


Next to those two lenses I've got thw 100mm macro f2.8 usm. And those three together really rule!





But then again, a 10-22 is really a great lens, but considering the price and the amount of usage...I don't think it's worth almost the same as an 17-55. Think about how often you will probably use that lens. Is it worth it? I can't recommend the 17-40, I had to choose between the 17-55 and the 17-40 last fall, but I chose the 17-55, I will try to find my topic on that, maybe it helps you a little!





More later []





http://community.the-digital-picture.com/forums/p/2430/18910.aspx#18910





By the way, yes I know you've got the 18-55 and the 28-135 already, I assumed you'd sell them for the other lens. Correct me if I was wrong [:P]