Well, the thing is there aren't any good comparisons on the net with the Sigma. All I have was the press release by Sigma or a no-brainer two paragraphs stating the obvious. Even I can write better reviews. I think we are too spoiled by Bryan! Bryan, if you are reading this, your reviews are the best reviews OF ANY KIND OF PRODUCTS, OF ANY KIND OF MEDIA I've ever read. The thing is, I don't understand how he did it over and over again for so many products and so accurately done. Ok, enough of Bryan worshiping. (Bryan, get back to work and write me a Sigma 10-20mm f/3.5 EX DC HSM). If someone would let me know how well the Tokina size up with these two, that will be a blast too.
In my market (Malaysia) the Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM is aboutUSD 825 and the Sigma 10-20mm f3.5 is USD 841. Slight and insignificant different. Few other factors I have to consider is that Canon does not come with the lens hood (which I have to fork out and buy). But the Sigma isn't that all free and done deal either, the filter size is a whooping 82mm!!! It will cost me a bomb to get a good UV and Polarizer.
FYI, the Tokina cost USD 723.




Reply With Quote
]