100-400 vs. 70-200/2.8L IS mk1 vs. 70-200/4 IS

[Chuck Lee]

Thanks, everyone. [img]/emoticons/emotion-1.gif[/img] It looks like the 70-200/2.8 IS is the way to go.
<div style="CLEAR: both"]</div>

Before you bite, I'd look at what Nate has done with the 400 f5.6. I know that's not one of your picks, but the value compared to the 70-200 f2.8 IS for wildlife photography wouldhave to make itmy overwhelming choice.


When photographing things that run away when you get close or can only be seen from a distance, the longer focal length the better....IMHO.