I started with the 70-200 non IS f4 due to cost. It is a great lens. For aperature only I bought the 70-200 f2.8 nonIS. I think both lenses are great. I just have not needed the IS in either case. The 2.8 lets me do more indoors. I use the 2.8 at weddings to shoot from the back of the church with no flash. When I traveled to Alaska this year I took the f4.0 and was pleased with ever shot ( I knew I would not need the extra f stop). The f4 takes great photos and is a great value. So I find a place for both in my collection. I never have considered selling any of my lenses.

I am waiting to hear the advantages of the new 70-200 II.


I you can only get one lens then get the 2.8 if you need one now at a lower cost then get the 4.0. If you end up with both you will sleep a happy man.


Frankly I think IS is overrated.