Results 1 to 10 of 26

Thread: Tripods - how sturdy does it need to be?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Vancouver, Washington, USA
    Posts
    1,956

    Re: Tripods - how sturdy does it need to be?



    Quote Originally Posted by freelanceshots


    A tripod with three sections per a leg will typically be more sturdy because of the size of the individual tubes. The downside to three legs instead of four is it will have a greater folded up height so it will be a littl more cumbersome to carry around.
    <div style="clear: both;"]</div>


    Agreed. It's even possible to get legs with just 2 segments or even just 1. The latter tend to only be on the used market. Tripods from the good old days could be pretty big because photographers back then weren't a bunch of namby pambies like we are now. []

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Melbourne, FL
    Posts
    1,246

    Re: Tripods - how sturdy does it need to be?



    Quote Originally Posted by Daniel Browning


    because photographers back then weren't a bunch of namby pambies like we are now. [img]/emoticons/emotion-2.gif[/img]



    Heard that!

  3. #3

    Re: Tripods - how sturdy does it need to be?



    Quote Originally Posted by Daniel Browning
    Tripods from the good old days could be pretty big because photographers back then weren't a bunch of namby pambies like we are now. [img]/emoticons/emotion-2.gif[/img]
    I think photographers back then if given the option of tripods that collapsed to 1/4 of the fully extended size and less then 1/2 their weight and still supported there camera the same would have gone with the ones we use today but thats just what I think []

  4. #4

    Re: Tripods - how sturdy does it need to be?



    Quote Originally Posted by Fred Doane


    Quote Originally Posted by Daniel Browning
    Tripods from the good old days could be pretty big because photographers back then weren't a bunch of namby pambies like we are now. [img]/emoticons/emotion-2.gif[/img]
    I think photographers back then if given the option of tripods that collapsed to 1/4 of the fully extended size and less then 1/2 their weight and still supported there camera the same would have gone with the ones we use today but thats just what I think [img]/emoticons/emotion-5.gif[/img]
    <div style="clear: both;"]</div>


    Yup... and your parents would have taken the bus to school instead of walking in the snow uphill both ways.

  5. #5

    Re: Tripods - how sturdy does it need to be?



    Advantages of one over the other? ........ Ballhead Vs. 3 way pan/tilt .... sorry if we coverd this elsewhere.[A]

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Chesapeake Virginia
    Posts
    281

    Re: Tripods - how sturdy does it need to be?



    Ballhead:


    simple workings, good support of weight, compactish. Kind of a pain to keep perfectly level and rotate unless you have a panning base (more $$), may become unscrewed from tripod if it lacks a locking feature.


    Panhead:


    independent movement of axis without throwing the others off, usually cheaper, good weigh support, best for video. Big annoying leavers, not as easy to operate as a simple ball head, harder to fine tune in a position.

  7. #7

    Re: Tripods - how sturdy does it need to be?



    So the ultimate setup would be a Wimberley Gimbal for action &amp; a 3way pan/tilt for everything else ....Including panos?


    .... and if so, a great addition would be a nodal slide, plate&amp; L bracket from RRSfor the pan/tilt setup?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •