I would love a 135mm f/2. Also, its not fair that you live in Hawaii, great website.
I would love a 135mm f/2. Also, its not fair that you live in Hawaii, great website.
Haha yeah Hawaii is great! You should check it out here sometime. I'm sad to leave but I'm moving to France to be with my girlfriend. It's the south of France so the weather is quite nice there too (not as nice as here of course - I think Hawaii is one of the best places in the world to be!)
Thanks for the comment on my website too! I like your ShutterFly site. The photo on the main page with the baseball pitcher.... VERY nice! Beautiful bokeh - was that the Sigma 50-150 f/2.8 ? I've been curious about that lens. I've used just about EVERY L-series lens Canon makes (no joke... think the 35mm f/1.4 and the 600 f/4 are the only two I haven't used!) but I haven't use many non-Canon lenses. I used to have a Sigma 17-70 and it was okay but then upgraded to my EF 24-105 f/4 L. Been curious about the Sigma telephotos... what do you think?
- Jordan
www.freshphotohawaii.com
My 135mm f/2 is one of my favorite lenses. I lust after the 200mm f/2 and would like to have a deeper relationship with it, but I'm not sure my wife would approve.
Originally Posted by Jordan
Gee. You poor guy.
Hawaii is my dream place to live because of the night sky. I've never been, though.
Southern France? Sounds terrible, you have my sympathies [:P]
Actually the baseball picture was taken with a Canon 300mm f/2.8 IS, sadly rented, not mine. But i do like that Sigma a lot, great for the price. Thanks for the comment on the site!
Yeah! The 300 f/2.8 is killer isn't it? I am thinking about renting it today to try and get some pics of Dennis Quaid and Helen Hunt up at Turtle Bay Resort..... I don't like being a paparazzi-guy though... haha!
f/2 is overrated [:P]
Is f/4 @ 500mm?? [:O]
Noooo, it can't be, f/4 @ 500 is way underrated.[]
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote