Quote Originally Posted by Jon Ruyle
I guess I know now why my macro shots turn out so much better than my astrophotos.

[]


Quote Originally Posted by Jesse Williamson


I've heard that the 17-55 has
issues with dust; something I assume the 24-105 wouldn't have. I'm
still new to the world of photography, so I'm not sure how much of a
concern that should be.


It's true; the 17-55 does get a lot more dust than the 24-105. The only question is whether it will be important or not. Personally, I don't think it has any appreciable effect on image quality, so I think the only negative effect will be on resale value.


Quote Originally Posted by Jesse Williamson


Also, how likely do you guys think Canon is to
release a 24-70 F/2.8L IS? I'm sure it wouldn't be cheap, but would
probably be worth saving up for.


My guess is that it is likely.