EF-S 15-85 f/3.5-5.6 is usm vs. EF 24-105 f/4 L on 7D

[Ricky]

Hi,


I've also considered the 17-55 but the range is too short
(for me), and for a little more i can get a 24-105, sure is an f/4 but
it has a great range despite not so wide, and all that come with L
series (weather sealed, construction....). I shoot most of the time
outdoors (yet) so f4 i think is enough, and the 7d can deliver good IQ
when pushing the ISO.


I'm searching a lens that can deliver good IQ since the 7D has a dense sensor.


Thanks to all for the comments!


Ricky

[Sheiky]

Alright, I thought since you have the 70-300 already, the range wouldn't be a problem.


You need to think of how wide you want a lens to be. 24mm on your camera is not really wide. 15 is really wide. It's a personal decision what you want...

[soerenrom]

<span style="font-size: 9pt; color: black; line-height: 115%; font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif'; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-bidi; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;" lang="EN-GB"]I just bought the 24-105 in addition to my ef-s 17-85 for the 50D. I have not had must time to shoot with it yet. Personally I find 24 to be wide enough. Sometimes I did the mistake with the 17-85 not the zoom in, and for me 17mm is a bit too wide. 24mm on a 50D works perfect for shooting the whole living room. But I would also like the new 15-85, just still have feelings for my old 17-85.