Quote Originally Posted by wickerprints
Right now, Nikon has better AF

Do you mean that the D3 af is better than the canon 1 series af, or just that their high end af's end up in less expensive cameras? (I think few would dispute that the D700 has a better af than the 5DII- that's probably the largest difference)


Quote Originally Posted by wickerprints
better noise control (though this "star-killer" thing makes me think they've gone a bit too far with that)

But who cares about that. With canon, you can turn NR off completely and use dedicated software later.


I should add that I really like Canon long exposure noise reduction. For long exposures, I get better results doing NR in camera than any other way (though that could just be because I don't know what I'm doing)


If I understand the "star killer" thing correctly, it is not relevant except in long exposures. Furthermore, there would be no real problem if only it could be turned off.


Quote Originally Posted by wickerprints
USM AF, IS, DO, CaF2--these are all Canon innovations.

In what way is fluorite a Canon innovation? Are you saying that the notion of using Fluorite in optics was Canon's idea, or were they just the first to use it in camera lenses? Or the first to use synthetic fluorite? Or something else?


Quote Originally Posted by wickerprints
the only company with a dedicated 1:1 - 5:1 macro

That's a biggie (in terms of utility, not in terms of innovation, I don't think). Why don't the Nikon guys want one?