f/2 is one stop faster than f/2.8 which means itwill gather twice as much light.Originally Posted by sirhc_1
f/2 is one stop faster than f/2.8 which means itwill gather twice as much light.Originally Posted by sirhc_1
Originally Posted by Mark Elberson
Based on my gear profile, I rather keep the 70-200mm 2.8 L non-IS than trading it with a 135 F/2 L since I do have an 85mm 1.8 for low light & has an equivalent FOV similar to a 136mm lens on a full frame. So, which one to chose for my 1.6 crop camera? the EF-S 60mm, EF 100mm macro L IS, or Sigma 150mm macro?
Since you have the 85mm for portraits, get the Sigma 150mm macro. Also of interest might be the Sigma 180mm f/3.5, which is just as good as Canon's own 180mm but for half the cost. Check out Juza's review:
http://www.juzaphoto.com/eng/articles/sigma_180mm_macro_review.htm
brendan