Originally Posted by adrian mandea
I'd have to say no to that. IMO, wildlife shots should use natural light. A flash has a use in wildlife photography, but that use is pretty much limited to creating catchlights in the subject's eyes (usually with flash exposure compensation dialing the flash power down).
The 100-400mm is a good wildlife lens (I just ordered mine!), but not 'great'. Great would be something like the 400mm f/2.8L IS - far out of most people's budget, but the extra 2 stops of light makes a big difference if the lighting is low.
--John
Reply With Quote