Canon EF 70-200 f/2.8 with or with IS

[Jarhead5811]

...sports, football, hockey, basketball, baseball, etc.

Action sports photography is one of the more popular uses for the non-IS Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L USM Lens as IS cannot stop subject action and f/2.8 is as fast as any EF zoom lens Canon makes.



<div style="CLEAR: both"]</div>

My Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L USM Lensis scheduled to arrive tomorrow. My primary subject is a 14 month old boy that is just starting to walk and is only still when he's asleep. I figure he's as active as any action sport.

[elmo_2006]

If it helps at all, I went with the 2.8 IS USM version as I cannot for the life of me keep my arms/hands still and could use the extra help. Even with a quick shutter speed, IS comes in handy when hand holding. But agreed it does not stop subject motion.


There's really no easy answer but possible recommendations. It comes down to preference. I knew going into the purchase that I needed the IS and that travelling around with a tripod/monopod was wishful thinking as there are moments where you would have wished for the IS version.


My $0.02 worth...

[Jarhead5811]

It comes down to preference.
<div style="CLEAR: both"]</div>

No, it comes to buget. [:P]





I just use the "IS can't stop motion" argumentto make me feel better about it. Some might call it sour grapes.

[elmo_2006]

LOL...then may I suggest where possible to rent both lenses over a couple of weekends to get a feel for the IS. If not and judging by your last retort, then it seems that you have made your decision due to cost which I fully respect. Either way you will enjoy the lens.


With a savings of $500, you may be able to purchase another lens or treat your loved one to a fancy dinner! [H]

[alexniedra]

There's really no easy answer but possible recommendations. It comes down to preference. I knew going into the purchase that I needed the IS and that travelling around with a tripod/monopod was wishful thinking as there are moments where you would have wished for the IS version.

I agree. It really depends on your preference. Sure, budget can sway your decision, but a decision based on budget alone is a decision you may very well regret later on. I recommend you think about your shooting conditions. There have been countless instances where IS has made it possible for me to shoot - mostly when I shoot images of musicians and public speakers in dimly-lit venues. Of course, it has it's limitations, which many have pointed out already - It can only do so much. But what it has done for me has easily justified the $500 CAD cost difference between the IS and non-IS versions.


Just like Elmo_2006, this is just another personal anectdote. My $0.02.