C&C - Some Florida birds!

[Brendan7]

Haha it doesn't really look green to me, nice colors that's for sure, but I wouldn't know why they called it a green heron [img]/emoticons/emotion-4.gif[/img]

True. Whoever names all these birds had a very creative mind. Sometimes the name isn't accurate (Green Heron), sometimes it's rather weird (think: Blue footed booby ~ the spaniards named it a booby or "dunce" because it was unafraid of humans) and sometimes the name hampers identification ~ the American Goldfinch male is golden yellow, but only in summer. Females, juveniles and winter males are actually quite pale.


About that egret, it was actually an accident! I was taking pictures of a moorhen when the Egret flew overhead; I didn't have time to adjust settings and so at first I thought it was washed out. Still having mixed opinions about that one.


brendan

[Sheiky]

Brendan one thing: I see that you use "tweener" iso settings. From what I've heard, iso640 is nothing more than iso800 metering and then adjusted 1/3 of a stop. So quality-wise it wouldn't make sense to use it. Just wanted to say that. I don't know what reasons you have and I guess at these ISO values the damage isn't great, but with larger values you might want to check it out.

True. Whoever names all these birds had a very creative mind

I really don't get it. Sorry I'm also not really a "birdsman" so I don't have any idea, but I never would have guessed the right color if they asked me []


Jan

[Brendan7]

Brendan one thing: I see that you use "tweener" iso settings. From what I've heard, iso640 is nothing more than iso800 metering and then adjusted 1/3 of a stop. So quality-wise it wouldn't make sense to use it. Just wanted to say that. I don't know what reasons you have and I guess at these ISO values the damage isn't great, but with larger values you might want to check it out.

I didn't know that! I don't really have a reason to be using 640 is 800 is basically the same. I understand photography from the artistic perspective more than the tech perspective and don't really get all the....complicated stuff. [um]

[neuroanatomist]

I see that you use "tweener" iso settings. From what I've heard, iso640 is nothing more than iso800 metering and then adjusted 1/3 of a stop. So quality-wise it wouldn't make sense to use it.

True. Personally, I have C.Fn I-2 set to 1 so only full stop ISOs are available. That also makes it much easier to rapidly adjust my ISO. Note that if you use Auto ISO, the camera will still use the 'tweener' 1/3 stop ISOs even withC.Fn I-2 set to full stops.

[Brendan7]

Going to Wakodahatchee Wetlands tomorrow, me thinks [ip]

[Sheiky]

I use that option for a while now. I don't really use autoiso, but I will believe you for that matter. I find it very easy and much more relaxt to change my iso quickly a step higher when I really need to. I rather have a constant iso and change aperture or shutterspeed to control the light then have iso control things for me.


Brendan, you'll never be outlearned believe me []

[Brendan7]

rather have a constant iso and change aperture or shutterspeed to control the light then have iso control things for me.

For me, aperture cannot be changed. I usually need a narrow aperture of at least f/5.6, sometimes f/8, f/9, and not unusually f11. Shutter Speed has to remain high, birds are highly mobile. And so I end up boosting ISO, with the 7D I can shoot ISO 1250 no sweat.

Brendan, you'll never be outlearned believe me [img]/emoticons/emotion-2.gif[/img]

It's true [8-|]