Quote Originally Posted by neuroanatomist


But,70-200 f/2.8 II vs. 70-200 f4 IS plus $1300 to spend on something else (I'm thinking the EF 35mm f/1.4L) is a very, very relevant debate...
<div>

</div>


Have you ever shot with the 35 1.4L? If you haven't you need to before you decide. The 35 will probably be the deal breaker. It has brought a tear to my eye on occasion.


If I didn't have to shoot night time and indoor sports I think I'd rather own the 70-200 4.0 IS.