-
Re: rookie comparison of 70-200 mk 1 and mk 2
I had the Mark I, but sold it a couple of days ago for 1500 and now am planning to upgrade to the Mark II. I currently own the 10-22mm, 24-105mm, and the 100mm is macro.
My big reason to upgrade is that with the 2X extender (for high school sports andwildlife)the image seems to be better than the Mark I and compares favorably to the 100-400mm (less so but still comparable to the 400mm f/5.6). Also, the new lens with the improved IS, in my opinion, obviates the need for the 85mm f/1.8 for low light photography.
Ifeel this 4 lens combination is more than sufficient for my needs.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules