Yes, you can put pretty much any tripod head on a monopod. But, should you?


I'd avoid the pan/tilt, and probably the ballhead as well. VR head? You can't really stop a monopod from moving, so there's no point in a VR head.


Have you tried the 682B in person? The retractable legs are not the easiest to extend/retract. If you're 'on the go moving quickly' I expect you'll not want to take the time to extend them, and they don't perform well on anything other than a flat surface. If you don't extend the legs, you need to support the monopod with one hand (with legs that short, I'd support the camera even with the legs extended!), meaning fiddling with a ballhead is not practical. Keep in mind that those little legs are short - you're not going to get anything even close to tripod-like stability from them.


So, I'd narrow your choices down to two - a joystick (the upright one) or the one-axis tilt head. The joystick head will be bigger and heavier, but will allow more 'flexibility' - but at a cost. A monopod is most effective when the load is balanced over the leg. The joystick will allow you to tilt the camera off at an angle, sure - but you'll lose a fair bit of the effectiveness of the monopod in that case, especially with a longer lens. Even though the tilt head is one axis, you can easily spin a monopod, so you really have two axes.


Which begs another question - what lenses? Usually, a monopod is used to steady the weight of a longer, heavier lens. Personally, I don't find much use for one with a shorter focal length lens, where the lighter weight and shorter focal length mean a monopod is not going to help much beyond handholding. Generally, you'll see much more benefit with a monopod for a lens with a tripod foot (the implication is that those require balancing because they are pretty heavy to handhold).


Since a monopod (without a 'standing base') can easily be tilted, you have a fair bit of freedom of motion. The main purpose of the head on a monopod is to facilitate changing from landscape to portrait orientation. The joystick head is nice for that, since you can operate it one-handed, but the tilt head is easy to operate, too.


Personally, I use a Manfrotto CF monopod (694CX) with the 234RC tilt head for my longer lenses (70-200mm f/2.8<span style="color: red;"]LIS II,100-400mm f/4.5-5.6<span style="color: red;"]L,200mm f/2.8<span style="color: red;"]L). I've found that it doesn't make a substantial difference with shorter lenses (17-55mm f/2.8, etc.), and for landscapes/macro the stability of a tripod is really best anyway. For the two white zooms, I have the QR plate parallel to the axis of the lens, so I use the tilt head for up/down tilt, and the tripod collar to change from landscape to portrait. For the 200mm prime (no collar), I have the QR plate on the camera base in 'normal' (perpendicular) orientation, so the tilt head changes from landscape to portrait (just like the drop-notch on the tripod ballhead). I picked the tilt head over the joystick head to keep the overall length of the monopod shorter, and to keep it lighter.


Hope some of that long diatribe helps!