Originally Posted by Sean Setters
Mainly to keep the DOF somewhat reasonable. The 50mm f/1.4 is sharpest down to f/2.8, as well. Maybe I destroy all that with the high ISO...who knows. Recommendation?
Originally Posted by Sean Setters
Mainly to keep the DOF somewhat reasonable. The 50mm f/1.4 is sharpest down to f/2.8, as well. Maybe I destroy all that with the high ISO...who knows. Recommendation?
Originally Posted by davideglasgow
I was just asking to make sure f/2.8 was necessary. If that's the case, then an f/2.8 zoom would be fine (in fact, probably ideal). However, if you could get away with shallower depth of field, then a cheaper (wider) prime might have fit the bill.