Originally Posted by Sheiky
I don't mind f/4 at all. In fact for many bird shots f/4 will give you a DoF undesirably thin. Which is why the 500 is a more logical choice, but f/2.8 is a plus and the 300 is more handholdable.
Originally Posted by Sheiky
I don't mind f/4 at all. In fact for many bird shots f/4 will give you a DoF undesirably thin. Which is why the 500 is a more logical choice, but f/2.8 is a plus and the 300 is more handholdable.