Nikon reviews?

[TucsonTRD]

Am I missing something here?
<div style="clear: both;"]</div>

I must be, I don't know what you are referring to...

[JamesG]

It's not hard mate

[TucsonTRD]

It's not hard mate
<div style="clear: both;"]</div>

Thanks for clearing that up???


Edit:


I seem to believe that you are in dismay that Nikon lenses are now going to be reviewed. I don't see what would have been difficult to state there.

[lynx0069]

maybe bryan is adding nikon lens reviews to the site for people that may be considering buying the converter that is available to mount nikon lenses to canon bodies......or perhaps he feels that since he has reviews for sigma, tamron, and zeiss lenses, why not add nikon lenses.......after all, nikon is canons biggest competetor (or are they?? think canikon [:P]) regardless of why bryan is adding nikon lens reviews, i look forward to reading them when he gets the reviews done.........i have always shot canon, ever since school way back in the day, but i am always reading up on nikon to see what they are bringing out. i am on nikon rumours site as much as i am on canon rumours site.


as to why bryan is adding nikon lens reviews......guess you'll have to ask him to enlighten us


jim

[peety3]

It's not hard mate
<div style="clear: both;"]</div>

Yes, it is. Brevity is one thing, but being so absent in your commentary is disruptive to the boards here.


Amongst other things, I'm not in front of a PC where I've configured RSS to follow anything. As a result, I hadn't seen the "news" posting that Bryan was beginning to post Nikon information. Just to understand what you were after, I took the time to go check. So, congratulations, you gave me the run-around when you could have made your point clearer from the word go.

[clemmb]

Am I missing something here?
<div style="clear: both;"]</div>

I must be, I don't know what you are referring to...
<div style="clear: both;"]</div>

[img]/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.UserFiles/00.00.00.24.67/Website.jpg[/img]

[TucsonTRD]

Am I missing something here?
<div style="clear: both;"]</div>

I must be, I don't know what you are referring to...
<div style="clear: both;"]</div>

[img]/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.UserFiles/00.00.00.24.67/Website.jpg[/img]
<div style="clear: both;"]</div>

Thanks for the pretty screen shot with the circle around the title. At the time, my question was what about Nikon reviews?


Should this site have had them already, should the site never get them, should the site never mention the name Nikon.


What exactly does "Nikon reviews?" mean? Seemed like an innocent question of not understanding the OP. I guess now I know the universal meaning of Nikon reviews?

[clemmb]

Am I missing something here?
<div style="clear: both;"]</div>

I must be, I don't know what you are referring to...
<div style="clear: both;"]</div>

<div style="clear: both;"]</div>

Thanks for the pretty screen shot with the circle around the title. At the time, my question was what about Nikon reviews?


Should this site have had them already, should the site never get them, should the site never mention the name Nikon.


What exactly does "Nikon reviews?" mean? Seemed like an innocent question of not understanding the OP. I guess now I know the universal meaning of Nikon reviews?
<div style="clear: both;"]</div>

I saw this appear just today so I assumed that is what your question was.


I would love to see Nikon reviews here but not at the expense of the speed and quality of the canon reviews.


Mark

[Keith B]

Natural progression in order to double ones revenue.


Surprised it took this long. Good for him.

[Jarhead5811]

Why not? What's the big deal?