Originally Posted by TucsonTRD
[img]/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.UserFiles/00.00.00.24.67/Website.jpg[/img]
Originally Posted by TucsonTRD
[img]/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.UserFiles/00.00.00.24.67/Website.jpg[/img]
Mark
Originally Posted by clemmb
Thanks for the pretty screen shot with the circle around the title. At the time, my question was what about Nikon reviews?
Should this site have had them already, should the site never get them, should the site never mention the name Nikon.
What exactly does "Nikon reviews?" mean? Seemed like an innocent question of not understanding the OP. I guess now I know the universal meaning of Nikon reviews?
Originally Posted by TucsonTRD
I saw this appear just today so I assumed that is what your question was.
I would love to see Nikon reviews here but not at the expense of the speed and quality of the canon reviews.
Mark
Mark
Natural progression in order to double ones revenue.
Surprised it took this long. Good for him.
Why not? What's the big deal?
T3i, Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8, 70-200mm f/2.8 L, Sigma 30mm f/1.4, 430ex (x2), 580ex
13.3" MacBook Pro (late '11 model) w/8GB Ram & 1TB HD, Aperture 3 & Photoshop Elements 9
Bryan plans to review Nikon lenses and DSLRs, I think this is great because it widens the playing field.
I like it.
Looking at the ISO Charts, I feel really good about being a Canon shooter. Especially when it comes to primes.