Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8

[mark]

if your happy with itwhats to comment on ....i would however suggest a little fill flash to do the photo of the lake some justice as for my tatste it is a little to dark ... i live in lake louise its an awesome place





cheers

[jhga22]

Mark, I agree...Lake Louise was probably not the best choice as I don't think any of my equipment, and certainly not my talent, can really do Lake Louise justice. This one is a little brighter, while still showing off the sharpness of this lens. The distortion is a little rough at 11mm but I think it's worth the trade...


[img]/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.UserFiles/00.00.00.26.58/Sheraton-Niagra-Falls_5F00_102508.jpg[/img]


The Seraton Niagra; Canon 40D w/ Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 at 11mm, f/13, 1/640, ISO 400


Let me know what you think...

[Oren]

I think that the building looks odd and I'm not (or at least I think I'm not) talking about the distortion. Also, the whole picture is a bit underexposed, but that's noting you can't fix using your favorite PP software in a snap.


Oh and I really like the sky (PP?).

[Oren]

Ohh and look at the upper right corner, is that dust on your sensor? [:P]

[jhga22]

This shot was taken after I was on the Maid of the Mist, so fortunately that is just a water spot on my lens filter...thought I had got all of them. [:$]


Thanks for the comments

[Itheone]

I've been doing quiet a bit of research on this lens, heard onlygood thingsabout it. It's going to be the next lens I purchase. I was going to get it last month but a 100-400 took it's place.

[7dfever]

But Sean of another thread commented negatively...


http://community.the-digital-picture.com/forums/t/1691.aspx?PageIndex=1


What makes such a discrepancy??