Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Aperture 3 vs. Lightroom 3

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,304

    Re: Aperture 3 vs. Lightroom 3



    Well since everyone is such an Aperture fan here I should show my love for Lightroom!


    Truly Mark, no program is better than Lightroom! Apple products are for fashion-junkies who don't know what they're talking about, trust me they go crazy by seeying the Apple-logo where it's all about. Aperture might bebetter looking on the outside and sold in a nice stylish package, but true love is in the inside: Lightroom.


    Buy Lightroom and find out that your photos will win contest after contest. Your photos will be more vibrant, better looking, better selling, better everything! Everytime I use Lightroom I feel like a kid in a candystore, it's too good to be true!


    Right!....back to seriousness []


    I never used aperture and honestly I have no clue what it looks like or how it functions. I only used Lightroom and DPP and I must say that I'm absolutely not a fan of DPP. Lightroom gives me a total package and I'm happy with it. The library-editor tab-thingy is something that also bothered me in the beginning, (to be honest, sometimes it still bothers me a little) but after a while it functions very good. For the more basic editing and the multiple file-adjusting it works great. For the more serious work you use the editor. Anyway I like that they give both options, easy and advanced, although I had rather seen it in 1 single mode with advanced-tabs or something.


    I must say that I like the workflow and the integration of multiple other programs like Photoshop, Photomatix and others.


    The thing I also like are the Library with importing and especially the exporting to files, but also the exporting to online-services and flash/html slideshows and webtemplates.


    Anyway I'm a satisfied user of Lightroom. It works for me so I won't be making a change to Aperture anytime soon []


    Sorry for the true Apple-fanatics between us, please don't take it all to serious [A]


    Jan

  2. #2
    Senior Member bob williams's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Central New Mexico
    Posts
    1,983

    Re: Aperture 3 vs. Lightroom 3



    I just have to jump on this band wagon----Yes, I am a huge Lightroom fan; and though I have never used Aperture I understand it is quite good as well. I have to say that the complete workflow layout and designis what I love the most about Lightroom. From Upload to output, lightroom has most anything the average photog needs or wants. Even when it comes to adjustments on specific areas of a photo, I would rather use the adjustment/burn/dodge tools in Lightroom, than jump in to layers in CS 3.4.5.......


    Normally, If my photos are so bad that I need CS/PS to repair, adjust or re-fabricate them, I just don'tbother.Of Course, I also don't have to make my living from my photographs---If I did, I might have a different opinion.


    I will say, That I do wish Adobe would put a nice selection of easy to use frame templatesin this software. There are plugins that allows you to put borders on your photos, but no frames that I can find. So, If I want to frame my work for presentation, I do have to use photoshop and orsome 3rd party software.





    Bob


    Bob

  3. #3
    Senior Member neuroanatomist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    3,918

    Re: Aperture 3 vs. Lightroom 3



    Quote Originally Posted by bob williams
    If I want to frame my work for presentation, I do have to use photoshop and orsome 3rd party software.

    I didn't think I was that old, but when I read "frame my work for presentation" I thought of prints and gallery frames, not Photoshop and Powerpoint.


    [:P]

  4. #4
    Senior Member bob williams's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Central New Mexico
    Posts
    1,983

    Re: Aperture 3 vs. Lightroom 3



    Quote Originally Posted by neuroanatomist
    I didn't think I was that old, but when I read "frame my work for presentation" I thought of prints and gallery frames, not Photoshop and Powerpoint.

    Ya Know, Your right, That sounded strange to me as well when I typed it --I guess it is an age thing. Anyway, I got to looking and found a frames plugin for Lightroom and am getting ready to download the trial and give it a shot. It's OnOne's Photoframe pro 4.5 and can be found here: http://www.ononesoftware.com/detail.php?prodLine_id=18





    Bob

  5. #5
    Senior Member bob williams's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Central New Mexico
    Posts
    1,983

    Re: Aperture 3 vs. Lightroom 3



    Quote Originally Posted by neuroanatomist
    I didn't think I was that old, but when I read "frame my work for presentation" I thought of prints and gallery frames, not Photoshop and Powerpoint.

    Ya Know, Your right, That sounded strange to me as well when I typed it --I guess it is an age thing. Anyway, I got to looking and found a frames plugin for Lightroom and am getting ready to download the trial and give it a shot. It's OnOne's Photoframe pro 4.5 and can be found here: http://www.ononesoftware.com/detail.php?prodLine_id=18





    Bob

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •