Canon (EF 100-400 L + EF 24-105) or EF 28-300

[neuroanatomist]

Welcome to the TDP forums!

Is it better to buy as it is about the same price and I should cover a good range with that:


1) EF 100-400 L + EF 24-105 L or


2) EF 28-300 L

#1 would be the better choice, I think. I have both of those lenses, and they work quite well on my 1.6x crop body (7D). The 28-300mm is a compromise lens; image quality with the other two is better, and you gain 100mm on the long end, and 4mm on the wide end (and that 4mm is noticeable).

Does L lenses work well with the 350 D, is it worth investing in good lenses with a poor case like the 350 D?

Yes and yes. Having better lenses will improve your IQ more than a newer camera.

Does the 3 lenses mentionned above fit the 350 D or should I buy some adapter (diameter)?

They will work fine. Any EF lens or EF-S lens will work on your camera.

I think it's better to have the 24-105 as a more multi use lense and change it as needed for long distance shot. What are you thoughts on this?

Not to add confusion, but have you also considered the EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM? IMO, it's the best general purpose zoom on a 1.6x crop body. Reasons not to get it would be if you plan to purchase a full frame camera soon, or if you really find you don't use the 18-24mm region of your current kit lens. 17mm is substantially wider than 24mm.


Good luck with your decision(s)!


--John