-
Re: Anyone Use 200mm f2.8L with 2x Extender?
[img]/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.UserFiles/00.00.00.26.55/100_2D00_400-resize-2.jpg.jpg[/img][img]/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.UserFiles/00.00.00.26.55/100_2D002D00_400-resize.jpg.jpg[/img]
[img]/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.UserFiles/00.00.00.26.55/70_2D00_200-resize.jpg.jpg[/img]
1. f/5.6 500 ISO 200 400mm
2. f/7.1 500 ISO 320 400mm
3. f/2.8 250 ISO 800 200mm
All I've done is re-size them from over 4000 pixels wide to 800 and drop the file size from 5mb to 70k. lol
The one thing to keep in mind here, I was inside the store, and their windows were not even remotely clean, so the outdoor shots might look like the have a little haze to them for good reason, but it's not the lens. Looking back I wish I would have grabbed a shot inside with the 400mm just to show the clarity.
They are all hand held shots at full zoom with IS active.
Isn't that shot from the 2.8 a goregous shot? Completely un-edited.
So there's a little comparison for ya!
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules