Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: 70-200 2.8II vs. f4 IS bokeh comparison? Or a visual bokeh comparison tool?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    2

    Re: 70-200 2.8II vs. f4 IS bokeh comparison? Or a visual bokeh comparison tool?



    As btaylor said f/4.0 is an very narrow DOF and is often capable of cutting someone's body or face in half when taking up most of the frame, f/2.8 is even narrower.

  2. #2
    Senior Member neuroanatomist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    3,918

    Re: 70-200 2.8II vs. f4 IS bokeh comparison? Or a visual bokeh comparison tool?



    Quote Originally Posted by Legion5


    As btaylor said f/4.0 is an very narrow DOF and is often capable of cutting someone's body or face in half when taking up most of the frame, f/2.8 is even narrower.



    Yes, the DoF is thin. But, if you compare the DoF at 200mm f/2.8 with a similarly-framed shot at 85mm f/1.2 (closer to the subject, obviously), the DoF at 85mm f/1.2 is less than half of that at 200mm f/2.8. The EF 85mm f/1.2L II is Canon's quintessential portrait lens. Granted, not all portraits are shot at f/1.2. But sometimes, that's the effect you want...and while you can stop down the 70-200mm f/2.8 for more DoF, you cannot open up the 70-200mm f/4 any wider than f/4 if you want the DoF to be shallower.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    278

    Re: 70-200 2.8II vs. f4 IS bokeh comparison? Or a visual bokeh comparison tool?



    Quote Originally Posted by neuroanatomist
    you cannot open up the 70-200mm f/4 any wider than f/4 if you want the DoF to be shallower.

    well you could but you'd need a good drill press and a hole saw... however, be forewarned this procedure would likely void your warranty!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •