The 70-200 f/2.8 II is an awesome lens. I currently have the MK1 and love it. Its certainly a great lens and will get you plenty of reach on a crop body. 1.6 X 70-200 = 112-320mm effectively. If you're doing a lot of wildlife though, I'd recommend the 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 IS. It has more reach, weighs about the same, and is cheaper than the 70-200.


Is there any particular need for the f/2.8? With the ISO capabilities of cameras you can settle for f/4 and still come out with excellent pictures. The only reason I'd say to get f/2.8 lenses is if you're generally shooting in very poor light without flash, and need the better light-gathering ability which translates to better auto-focusing in poor light.


I know that the 24-70 has been on the update list for the past 3 years, but I have good sources saying this may be the year


Mike