Hi Guys,


Thanks a lot for your replies!


Daniel,


Unfortunately the 15-85 is a bit out of my possibilities right now, even though it might only be around 15% more expensive than the 18-200 I can't really find any 2nd hand available at a reasonable price (for my pocket).


I guess the EF-S 18-135mm could / should be an option as well. I think when I first started my decision process I decided that if I went to an EF-S would probably just take the highest range possible assuming the quality would be similar (I don't see myself changing to a full body anytime soon but I guess the value of an EF lens in the long run would always be better).Maybe I went wrong there!


Still worried about the quality on both of them being somewhat lower than in the 18-55 =/





Elmo


Thanks for your input. Is the post processing with Canon DP something automatic that the program can adjusts based on the lenses known defects or a photo by photo manual process?


what would you say to Daniel suggestion on the EF-S 18-135?


I haven't looked a lot into third party lenses as I've never tried any and had no reference for quality. I reckon they are a lot cheaper, I read some reviews on the website on a couple of them. would the Sigma 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 comparable to the EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS in terms of image quality?





Thank you once more guys