Which 70-200mm?

[Baker]

Given the prices, you could get the 85mm f/1.8 (or the 50mm f/1.4) for your portraits the 70-200mm f/4L non-IS for outdoor sports and still be within (or nearly so) your current budget. [img]/emoticons/emotion-14.gif[/img]
<div style="clear: both;"]</div>

Oh I like the way you think. Now I must decide if I want the 135 f/2L or the 85 f/1.8 and 70-200 f/4L non IS......

[JJphoto]

Oh I like the way you think. Now I must decide if I want the 135 f/2L or the 85 f/1.8 and 70-200 f/4L non IS......

no mater which prime you will pick, it's most likely you are not going to like the zoom any more after you see the results from one of these two primes, apertures wider than f2.8 is a different world IMO, it just has more fun to play with those fast primes, they are lighter, smaller, faster, sharper, better isolation, better bokeh and hey! they are cheaper. I think every Canon dslr user should have a 85mm1.8 and if you can afford , the 135mm 2.0 is even better.( in terms of IQ,I'm not counting the focal length you may need though).


another thing you may need to think about is that since you will shoot a lot of sports, you should think about getting a XXD/7D instead. rebels are very good bodies, but they are too slow for catching the action of sports.

[dsiegel5151]

I was in the exact situation that you are in a few years ago. I ended up doing exactly what neuroanatomist suggested. E.g., I went with the 70-200 f/4L non-is and the 85 f/1.8. Couldn

[Baker]

I think every Canon dslr user should have a 85mm1.8 and if you can afford , the 135mm 2.0 is even better.( in terms of IQ,I'm not counting the focal length you may need though).
<div style="clear: both;"]</div>

I'm leaning towards just getting the 85mm f/1.8 and putting the rest of the money towards my next photography purchase, whether it's a lens or a body.

another thing you may need to think about is that since you will shoot a
lot of sports, you should think about getting a XXD/7D instead. rebels
are very good bodies, but they are too slow for catching the action of
sports.

What body do you think would be the most cost effective choice for me? My T2i is less than a year old and it was a graduation present from my parents so I'm not sure if I will be getting a new body anytime soon but it never hurts to check it out.

[JJphoto]

Baker, I don't have any first hand experience with any XXD body, when I need a faster body, I bought the 7D, it's great for capturing fast moving subjects. but it's more expensive. I don't like to talk about the lenses/bodies that I don't have or used, so if you go with XXD body, I only guess most people will suggest 50D over 60D because it has" microadjustment" and it's cheaper than 60D. a refurbished 50D with kit lens is selling for $899 while the 60D will costs $1100 body only(there is store selling about $70 cheaper though).


anyway I like the way you are thinking now, getting a better body with the 85mm 1.8 to start with is a better idea. I have become a prime guy after used 85mm1.8(I don't mind to use zoom for wide angle though)[]


good luck!

[dsiegel5151]

I

[neuroanatomist]

It's true that in a lot of ways the 7D is a substantial improvement over a T2i (although they use the same image sensor). While I agree that the 7D is a great camera, the 'standard' advice (and it's standard for a good reason!) is to invest in lenses before a body upgrade (or a 2nd body).


Baker - you're considering a 70-200mm and now maybe an 85mm f/1.8. From another post, you have the 18-55mm kit lens, the 55-250mm lens, and the 50mm f/1.8 II. I think you'll be better off with new lenses rather than a new body right now. Bodies are updated frequently - learn on the T2i, and get the latest and greatest body that fits your budget when you decide to upgrade. Lenses, on the other hand, you can keep and use for many years.


Questions for those recommending a 7D upgrade - which will deliver better results for the types of shots Baker is looking to take, a 7D with the 18-55mm kit lens from his T2i, or a T2i with a better lens? With narrow-aperture kit lenses, how easy is it to take good outdoor portraits? For sports shots on a body with fast AF like the 7D or to a lesser extent one of the xxD bodies, can a non-USM lens keep up with the AF speed of the body? I'd guess that the T2i + a better lens would perform better overall, but that's speculation since I've never had a 'kit lens' nor a lens without true USM (when I started with a T1i, I got the 17-55mm f/2.8 IS to go with it, and despite the fact that it's bundled with the 5DII, I don't consider the 24-105mm f/4L a 'kit lens').


--John

[dsiegel5151]

John makes a good point. Get the lenses you need before upgrading a body. While it

[JJphoto]

Questions for those recommending a 7D upgrade

I guess you were asking me since only dsiege5151 and i have mentioned 7D.


No, I didn't recommend 7D, I ,in fact, I would get 50D if I was a student.(I'll sell the T2i)

the 'standard' advice (and it's standard for a good reason!) is to invest in lenses before a body upgrade (or a 2nd body).

T2i is not cheap, a 5D is almost the same price, and if you know where to buy, a new 7D will only cost you about $1400.(out of stock right now, but will be back soon I believe, you could get it for less than $1300 before, man!, I miss bing cash)

For sports shots on a body with fast AF like the 7D or to a lesser extent one of the xxD bodies, can a non-USM lens keep up with the AF speed of the body? I'd guess that the T2i + a better lens would perform better overall, but that's speculation since I've never had a 'kit lens' nor a lens without true USM

the speed of AF and speed of USM are not the only thing, and I think the shutter lag and burst rate are also important for catching a fast moving subjects


just my 2 cents