Help
Remember Me?
What's New?
Forum
New Posts
FAQ
Calendar
Community
Member List
Forum Actions
Mark Forums Read
Quick Links
Today's Posts
Home
Reviews
Tools
News
Site Index
Advanced Search
Forum
Photography Gear
Canon Lenses
16-35 2.8L or 16-35 2.8L II
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the
FAQ
by clicking the link above. You may have to
register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Results 1 to 10 of 11
Thread:
16-35 2.8L or 16-35 2.8L II
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version
Email this Page…
Search Thread
Advanced Search
Display
Switch to Linear Mode
Switch to Hybrid Mode
Threaded Mode
Threaded View
Previous Post
Next Post
10-15-2010,
04:25 AM
#3
c.edwards
View Profile
View Forum Posts
Private Message
Junior Member
Join Date
Dec 2008
Posts
9
Re: 16-35 2.8L or 16-35 2.8L II
Hey Stapled, I do agree with you. I don
Reply With Quote
Quick Navigation
Canon Lenses
Top
Site Areas
Settings
Private Messages
Subscriptions
Who's Online
Search Forums
Forums Home
Forums
Photography Gear
Canon Digital SLR Cameras
1-Series Cameras
Canon Lenses
Accessories
Buy & Sell
Image Presentation
Assignments
Image Critique
Show & Tell
Photography Tips & Techniques
Image Capture
Post Processing
General Discussion
Open Talk
«
Canon 50mm 1.4, Canon 50mm 1.2 and the Sigma 50mm 1.4
|
Which 70-200mm?
»
Posting Permissions
You
may not
post new threads
You
may not
post replies
You
may not
post attachments
You
may not
edit your posts
BB code
is
On
Smilies
are
On
[IMG]
code is
On
[VIDEO]
code is
On
HTML code is
Off
Forum Rules
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote