Bob, that is one heck of a photo, nicely done!
Bob, that is one heck of a photo, nicely done!
Canon 450D Gripped, Canon 24-105 f/4L, Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS USM II, Sigma 10-20 EX f/4-5.6, Canon S95
“There are always two people in every picture: the photographer and the viewer.” -Ansel Adams
Thanks elmo
Bob
I absolutely do not mean to be a pain in the butt, but I find the title a tittle of the thread a little confusing.
When I first read"Depth Of Field - the wider the better" I startedsearchingthe My Picture folderfor possible submissions which in my mindwere photographs with a wide depth of field, forexample landscapes with everything from foreground tobackground in focus. I found a few potential candidates and opened the assignment thread only to find that "the wider the better" part relates to the aperture!
As far as theactual topic, I think it is a great one and I am hopefully going to take a fresh photo, just for the assignment!
Originally Posted by piiooo
That's true. By his following description, I would think "The shallower, the better" would be a more accurate (or less confusing) title. :-)
Great picture Bob, but the aperture is f/11.
He said he wants a wide aperture, "open up those apertures"
Elmo, what do you mean by wide DOF?
I'm confused too!
Rich
Originally Posted by Richard Lane
Rich, Thanks. I read all of that as well, But Elmo ended his assignment with " Let's see that bokeh", So...... there is more than one way to achieve bokeh, even at F11. Hopefully I understood his assignment correctly.--If not, I am sure he will clarify []
Bob
Bob
I'm SOOOO confused! [:S]
I was looking thru my photos and I have some with great bokeh with my macro at f/8 and f/11 but figured it didn't qualify. I think I'll break out the 35mm this weekend!
Hmm, it seems the "circle of confusion" is growing. [:P]
But I'm going to assume (based upon Elmo's pic example) the contest is about a thin DOF.
Bob....great HB capture....I was going to enter one of my thin DOF HB pix, but now I'm reconsidering.
Elmo....the masses need some clarification; do you mean thin or forever DOF?
Good luck everybody
Bill
Originally Posted by Bob Williams
Absolutely agree Bob!
You see Bob.., I wanted this clarified, because I don't have anything that good! [:P]
Rich
I'll jump in: Since we can only submit once I hate being first but here goes: If I understand the assignment: Thin DoF, wide open aperture, not a typical pet, tree, or portrait:
[img]/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer-Discussions-Components-Files/26/6180.Thin_5F00_DoF_5F00_EXIF.png[/img]
[img]/resized-image.ashx/__size/1024x0/__key/CommunityServer-Discussions-Components-Files/26/3107.Thin_5F00_DoF.jpg[/img]