Quote Originally Posted by Jon Ruyle


You aren't autoguiding those wide angle, 3 minute exposures are you?


I just meant- why bother with long exposures when stacking short exposures gives such good results.
<div style="clear: both;"]</div>


Yes I do use the autoguiding even for wide angle exposure that long. The CG5 GT mount isn't that accurate, especially when you overload it like I do. And no mater what camera and lens I use it does make a difference in the stars


Why bother with long exposures? Increased image data / SNR.
Stacking multiple exposure gives you a better SNR, but it doesn't necessarily increase your exposure / saturation. Stacking multiple longer exposure will result in a better image than stacking multiple shorter exposures or a single very long exposure.


An assumption that many people make is that if you stack 40 x 30 second exposures that it will equal a 20 minute exposure. When in fact what you will have is a cleaner looking 30 second exposure instead. Don't get me wrong, more exposure will gain more detail than a single longer exposure, but only because you are improving the signal to noise ratio.


This thread can explain it better than I can here.
SNR and Total Signal