Manual all the way.
Manual all the way.
Originally Posted by Daniel Browning
Daniel, as usual, you are absolutely correct, and "no" it is not a good reason to stop using AISO---I was just venting when I first started this string. What bothers me most is my own "air-headedness" is that even a word? Anyway, I still think that AISO is very valuable in many situations---but it should be closely monitored, as with any auto setting. With me personally, If I am shooting full manual, then I am normally very cognizant of my settings, but when shooting auto anything I seem to forget about my settings and fail to monitor them. It's just another lesson learned the hard way. But......I will try again. Sometimes, I just need to know that I am not the only idiot that makes these kind of mistakes and often blow a potentially great shot.
Thanks for keeping it real Daniel- I have yet to be able to argue with your logic.
Bob
Bob
One post back there left me wondering "have the camera check the histogram and shift just before taking the photo" (or words similar to that effect).
The in-camera meter is trying to meter something (depending on your meter setting) to mid-grey. How about instead something tailored for the capabilities /limitations of digital sensors that instead checks the brightest and darkest points and ensures they fit best in the dynamic range of the sensor with, to my understanding, a bias towards not blowing out the highlights if the dynamic range of the scene is too large for the sensor.
The correct "exposure" based on the colour, actual scene brightness or photographer's preferencecan be set in post processing but at least you know the camera fit the scene into its sensor's dynamic range without pixels climbing up the left or right of the histogram.
Or perhaps that is what that "highlight tone priority" on a 1D mk4 does, but I've not read-up on that....
By the way - I don't have auto-ISO, but that previous post got me wonderring.
Paul.