Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: 7d vs 60d mostly sports

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member neuroanatomist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    3,922

    Re: 7d vs 60d mostly sports



    Hi, and welcome to the TDP forums!


    Quote Originally Posted by ffron
    Will the 7D be significantly better for this purpose then the 60D?

    Yes.


    Quote Originally Posted by ffron
    Can someone explain the AF feature for moving objectsof the 7D, I know there is an aperture limit. Will it work with my 70-200 lens set to 2.8?

    There's not really 'aperture limit'. The 7D and 60D both have a high-precision center AF point that works with lenses that are f/2.8 or faster. It doesn't matter what aperture the lens is set to, since autofocus is done with the aperture wide open (it closes down just as you take the picture).


    However, while both have an AI Servo mode for tracking moving subjects, the AI Servo mode on the 7D is better (more AF points, better processor, better algorithms). Short of a 1D-series body, the 7D has Canon's best AF system, and that's what matters for tracking moving subjects.


    One more key point on the AF system - sports, especially indoors with no flash, means fast aperture lenses shot wide open. That's where you get the most benefit from autofocus microadjustment, a feature that allows you to calibratethe AF system to match specific lenses (accounts for variations due to manufacturing tolerances). Pros used to send their cameras and lenses into Canon for this service, but with the 7D you can do it yourself. The 50D had the feature, but for some reason Canon left it out of the 60D.


    Quote Originally Posted by ffron
    I considered the 5dm2, which I see at a refurbished price of $2,000. From looking at the tests on this site I see that its high ISO noise level is much better than the 7D or 60D. But I don't really think it is a sports camera. Thoughts?

    Yes, the 5DII is better at high ISOs. The 'crop factor' applies to ISO noise as well (which is dependent on total light hitting the sensor), by factor of 1.6 (which is 1.33 stops). But no, the 5DII is not a sports camera. The shutter lag is too long, and AF is not adequate, in my opinion, for tracking moving subjects - especially coming toward or moving away from you. My 5DII has trouble keeping up with my 3-year-old running toward me - my 7D can handle that even with the thin depth of field (where focus is most critical) and relatively slow AF system of the EF 85mm f/1.2<span style="color: #ff0000;"]L II shooting at f/1.2.


    Bottom line, for your purposes the 7D is the camera best suited.


    Hope that helps...


    --John

  2. #2
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    2

    Re: 7d vs 60d mostly sports



    Thank you for the response.


    That was pretty much what I had decided.


    Frank

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    388

    Re: 7d vs 60d mostly sports



    FPS or frames per second is key in getting sports action frozen in time. The 7D outweighs both the 60D and the 5dm2. More FPS means you

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    246

    Re: 7d vs 60d mostly sports



    Quote Originally Posted by neuroanatomist


    My 5DII has trouble keeping up with my 3-year-old running toward me - my 7D can handle that even with the thin depth of field (where focus is most critical) and relatively slow AF system of the EF 85mm f/1.2<span style="color:#ff0000;"]L II shooting at f/1.2.


    Hm, that's quite a common use case for my 5D2 when I'm at home ... must ... resist ... adding a 7D as second body!


    Really impressive, if it manages that at f/1.2, the difference in AF is larger than I thought!


    Colin

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •