Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: 40D vs 7D

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1

    Re: 40D vs 7D



    I have a question that doesn

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    233

    Re: 40D vs 7D



    Welcome to the forum Frank,


    If it is an either/or option, I would recommend the lens. However, I am going to recommend a lens you did not mention, The EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM. I have both the 17-55 and the 24-70 and I much prefer the 17-55 results on my 50D. I realize this may seem like a duplication of what you have, but the quality difference between the 17-55 and the 18-55 is night and day. Kind of a Ferrari and a Yugo are both cars kind of thing.


    Obviously, the best upgrade would be the 7D and the EF-S 17-55. I do not know how tight your budget is, but with the current Canon rebates if you order both together you could get them for $2519 with the rebate doubled on the lens. If you have not done so yet, I would recommend you read Bryan's reviews.


    http://the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EF-S-17-55mm-f-2.8-IS-USM-Lens-Review.aspx


    http://the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EOS-7D-Digital-SLR-Camera-Review.aspx


    If you are going to be making a purchase, please consider clicking on a link following one of the reviews as that helps maintain this site.


    Chris

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    243

    Re: 40D vs 7D



    Quote Originally Posted by Frankd7


    [.........] Which one?
    <div style="clear: both;"]</div>


    Well personally, I agree that an EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM is way to go, especially vs the EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L USM as long as you aren't planning a FF upgrade soon. Now, IF you can deal with shooting with a prime lens, I'd highly recommend going with a 50mm f/1.4 or 85mm f/1.8. Hell, you can get BOTH for the price of the EF-S 17-55. Now, having said that, the 17-55 is much more versatile, but the other two will both get you better images in low light or fast action (sounds like you'll be doing a little of both!). Also, I WOULD NOT IN ANY SITUATION PUT THE 18-55 KIT LENS ON YOUR CANON 7D.... that almost makes me want to cry!






  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    388

    Re: 40D vs 7D



    Hi Frankd7. I found the 24-70 f/2.8 to be a little slow to freeze the action for indoor sports. granted, as a hobbyist i am shooting youth events in junior high and high school gyms. these environments are unfortunately some of the most poorly lit you can find. I stepped up to the 135 f/2 lens and have been much happier. if you plan on being really close to the action like under the basket, a 50 mm f/1.4 @ f/2 is another option (this lens runs for around $275-$300). this will give you an effective reach of 80 mm on your 7D.

  5. #5

    Re: 40D vs 7D



    I have upgraded from 50D to 7D. Reason.


    - Better display.


    - Better with low noise conditions. ISO


    - Video. It's fun.


    - Better grip, better feeling

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •