Your right I took a look again, the 1.4x III is a little sharper in the center. This might be a little improvement in that the long Tele
Your right I took a look again, the 1.4x III is a little sharper in the center. This might be a little improvement in that the long Tele
Those extenders have gotten so expensive it
Originally Posted by freelanceshots
Doesn't the way your gear looks improve your photos? The new MkII supertele primes will have, "A highly durable white leather-tone coating ... This is a new, more neutral shade of white compared to earlier lenses. It is intended to indicate that the IS II lenses have evolved..." The white paint on the new MkIII extenders matches the paint on the new supertele primes. Do you really expect people to use an extender with that old, outdated white paint when they can pay $200 more for almost equivalent optical performance, but get a paint that matches their new lens?
[:P] [:P] [:P]
Camera anything is absurdly expensive but I guess that's what kind of makes it an exclusive club. When camera gear prices come down and IQ still goes up everybody thinks they can start shooting professionally. I just have to remember that the best photographs come from the photographer and not their gear.
I would be interested to seeif the claimed increase in AF speed and accuracy of the extenders MkIII is substantial enough.I alsowonder if they are compatible with older lenses, and if so, how they comparewith the MKII extenders.
The 2X III maybe not that good anyway but I think it
I don
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote