70-200mm f/2.8L IS II Test images

[Richard Lane]

Some people aren't that pleased with it, but I'm very happy with the 2X as well, especially for stationary objects in good lighting, since the lens essentially becomes a f/5.6 with a 75% reduction in AF speed.

[btaylor]

Yep not everyone's happy with the combo. The way I see it for me, if I wanted the extra reach the 1.4x could provide me I'd just use my 40D. BUT I'm so in love with my 5D2 that I'd be more likely to use it with the 2x extender than the 40D with nothing. I'm a little bit hooked on the images from the 5D2 so the 40D doesn't get much use these days. It's good to have as a backup though.


The 2x extender combo images look sharp enough to me, but you're right it'd be best used for stationary objects. DOF at 400mm is still nice and shallow at f/5.6.


I wonder how much the reduction in AF speed would hurt. At the moment AF is pretty much instantaneous. 1.75 x bugger all = still bugger all []

[btaylor]

Oh, by the way. "Bugger All" isn't some sort of foul language. A bit of Australian slang I suppose meaning "very little". I often forget about the language differences between us and... well... the rest of the world. []

[HDNitehawk]

Very nice btaylor...congratz


I got mine last week, and I was really impressed with the IQ. I have never had a canon zoom that I could crop so much out of, until now.

[Richard Lane]

I wonder how much the reduction in AF speed would hurt. At the moment AF is pretty much instantaneous. 1.75 x bugger all = still bugger all [img]/emoticons/emotion-2.gif[/img]

That would be correct!


The AF speed is still very useable, as you mentioned 75% slower X very fast is still fast.


The AF speed reduction as reported by Canon, has to due with the smaller aperture of f/5.6 as well as the reduction in IQ from the extender.


By the way, in case you weren't aware, the 1.4X extender has a 50% reduction in AF speed.





Rich

[JJphoto]

you know I

[btaylor]

Yeah I was a little hesitant as well JJ. But so far I've got no regrets purchasing this one. It's a big step up from the f/4L IS in my opinion. Here's a couple more I took this afternoon.





A bit of new growth after a bush fire just went through this area:


5D Mark II, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II @ ISO 100, 70mm, f/2.8, 1/3200 sec.


[img]/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer-Discussions-Components-Files/8/1440.IMG_5F00_3911.jpg[/img]





5D Mark II, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II @ ISO 500, 200mm, f/8, 1/500 sec.


[img]/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer-Discussions-Components-Files/8/4401.IMG_5F00_3905.jpg[/img]





5D Mark II, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II @ ISO 400, 200mm, f/8, 1/640 sec.


[img]/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer-Discussions-Components-Files/8/3487.IMG_5F00_3775.jpg[/img]





100% Crop


[img]/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer-Discussions-Components-Files/8/3426.IMG_5F00_3775-100-crop.jpg[/img]

[neuroanatomist]

Great shots, Ben! The 5DII with 70-200 II is really an amazing and versatile combination.

[bouwy]

You lucky B........ Shots are great. Post some more pic

[iso79]

You can still get the non-IS 70-200mm f/2.8 for $1300 plus it