-
Re: 50mm f/1.4 vs f/1.2 L
Thanks for all your input folks! Yeah, I really am looking for an excuse to get the 50L, but in reality, I figure there is little need for it. In fact, other than weddings, I feel there is NO need for it. I'm just trying to see if I start doing weddings, if it's something worth upgrading to. I WISH I had the 200 f/2 Justin. I have used it before (there is a photo on my site of a football player hiking the ball... that was with a 7D, 200 f/2 and 2x converter) but I've found the 70-200 f/2.8 with a 1.4x does fine for sports, and without the converter for most portraits (see photo below, 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM & 1.4x converter on a 7D). I have the 85mm f/1.4 (Zeiss) for portraits, but being manual focus it's hard for moving people and not great for when I NEED the shot. I think I'll stick with the 50mm f/1.4 for now, as I know that's a more than capable lens. I need to start making money with the photography.. before I go buy more toys! The only thing I really NEED right now is a FF camera... and it would be nice to have a wider fast prime... like the 35mm f/1.4 L. Soon I hope! 
[View:http://freshpics.smugmug.com/Other/PORTFOLIO/16128507_KAPYd#1210931677_jcf56-M-LB:550:0]
freshpics.smugmug.com
freshphotography.us
freshphotoblog.com
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules