OOOPS!


I owe everyone an apology or at least Canon 17-55 2.8 IS USM owners. I was under the impression (must be lack of caffeine) that said lens is of the trombone type whereby my initial commentary should have indicated *double* but either way incorrect information.


The Drama continues...


Would it make sense to sell the Sigma 10-20 and possibly splurge on the Sigma 17-50 2.8 OS HSM whereby saving myself the 600 over the Canon? Again my concerns are deeply rooted in confined *quarters* and available light and let