When I saw the thread title I thought it must be someone doing time lapse. That is an amazing number ..... it would take 1000 sessions shooting 2000 frames each session ...... that
When I saw the thread title I thought it must be someone doing time lapse. That is an amazing number ..... it would take 1000 sessions shooting 2000 frames each session ...... that
The 3000 number is accurate, but I should have mentioned that weddings are 4000-5000!
Wow - that
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ben_taylor_au/ www.methodicallymuddled.wordpress.com
Canon 5D Mark III | Canon 5D Mark II | Samyang 14mm f/2.8 | Canon 35mm f/1.4L USM | Sigma 85mm f/1.4 EX DG HSM |Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II |Canon 2 x Teleconverter III | Canon 580 EX II Speedlite | Really Right Stuff TVC 34L | Really Right Stuff BH55 LR | Gorillapod Focus | Really Right Stuff BH 30
I shoot between 100 and 200 for a portrait session and 1000 for a wedding. The most I have ever shot at one wedding was 1500 and that was an east Indian wedding, two cameras going the whole time. The time on the computer afterwards was a killer also since I am a part time photographer. I usually have 3 to 5 almost identical frames for set up shots. Candids are what burns most at a wedding.
Mark
Mark
First, I
Bob
I think I may be approaching 2 million actuations after all these write rate tests
Seriously that is impressive....I
Originally Posted by Bob Williams
Bob, I could understand this. When I've been at an airshow, which can last for 4 or more hours, I'll shoot as many as 2500. But, for a senior portrait, where the subject is stationary, it's ridiculous. Even with a change of clothes or two, 3000 shots is well beyond what is needed to capture the person. This is particularly true for a studio environment. Then, the processing! Yikes. And, storing the files. Yikes, Yikes!
It's spray and pray gone/run amok.