I just used the slang word dog to describe bad. It is not a lens description term.
As far as using it a handfull of times, I think it is a very believable statement. I have used mine probably far less than 10 times in the last year. Since I am an amature with a few other lenses, a big specialty lens like this only gets used when you need it. For me it has been mainly at the kids and grandkids baseball and softball games.
Dings and scratches do not indicate a lens has been used a handfull of times. Allot of dings and scratches may indicate that it has been used professionally, employees tend to treat equipment rougher than owners. Amatures usualy baby there equipment because it is such a big expense for them. (for professionaly used keep in mind the ball games you might have seen, where the player runs over the photog and the lens goes flying)
In two years of using my 500mm F4L, which I use quit regularly, it has no scratches or abrasions at all on it.
The best senario you can find is an amature who is upgrading to the new 300mm F2.8L IS II. With the lens having very few scratches or marks.
Here is the main thing I would want with a lens this expensive: A uncoditional full refund return policy for the lens. This way you could check the lens out to make sure it worked mechanicaly the way it is supposed to.





Reply With Quote