Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Canon 135 F/2L + 100 F 2.8L IS VS Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member neuroanatomist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    3,918
    Incidentally, Rick, I say that the 70-200 II is also the exception to the rule that primes deliver better IQ. In my experience with those three lenses, the 70-200 II delivers IQ that's at least as good as those two primes.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Planet Earth
    Posts
    3,114
    Quote Originally Posted by neuroanatomist View Post
    Incidentally, Rick, I say that the 70-200 II is also the exception to the rule that primes deliver better IQ. In my experience with those three lenses, the 70-200 II delivers IQ that's at least as good as those two primes.
    John, I would say that a person has to be a pixel peeking extremist to really notice the difference. The 70-200mm F2.8L II is that good. In some respects I think it gives a different feel than the 100mm when doing portraits. Lately I have preferred the 70-200mm over the 100mm for potraits.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •