Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: EF 70-200mm f/2,8 L USM Versus EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 L IS USM

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member thekingb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Milwaukee, WI
    Posts
    512
    Quote Originally Posted by Daniel Browning View Post
    It's like trying to decide between a dumptruck and a Ferrari.
    I kinda like my dump truck. It's rugged and useful and gets the job done

    But Daniel is right about the comparison. I actually sold the 70-200 L f/4 IS to get the 70-300. The only reason was to gain 100mm. That particular 70-200 is an incredible lens, especially considering the size, weight and cost.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Vancouver, Washington, USA
    Posts
    1,956
    Quote Originally Posted by thekingb View Post
    I kinda like my dump truck. It's rugged and useful and gets the job done
    Actually, I was thinking of the 70-200 f/2.8 as the dump truck: big and heavy. The 70-300L is small and agile by comparison.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •