Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: Canon EF 17-40 F4 L compared to Canon 17-55 2.8 IS USM lens

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. 04-21-2012, 06:16 PM #12
    FastGass
    FastGass is offline
    Senior Member FastGass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Beautiful Ferndale Washington.
    Posts
    154
    The 17-40mm is actually softer than the much lemented "Kit lens", and then you read the reviews on "How much better it is" than the kit lens.

    Here is the link to the resolution crops http://www.the-digital-picture.com/R...mp=0&APIComp=0.

    I wish Bryan would also shoot the 24-105mm on the 50D to see how it compares to the kit lens or 17-55mm f/2.8.

    John.
    Last edited by FastGass; 04-21-2012 at 06:18 PM.
    Amateurs worry about gear, pros about the pay, masters about the light, and I just take pictures!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Pulled trigger on a 70-200 2.8 IS II | Another question on sharpness of the Pic. »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules