Results 1 to 10 of 36

Thread: 5dMKIII.....taking the picture....Post Processing.....PRINT

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Vancouver, Washington, USA
    Posts
    1,956
    Quote Originally Posted by jks_photo View Post
    With the MKIII zero correction printing is now possible and the colors look "natural".

    I'm glad you're getting good results. There are only three possible explanations for what you see: spectral QE changes in the CFA, updated raw converter software, and/or placebo effect. According to DxO tests, the primary change that Canon made to the CFA from the 5D2->5D3 is that the blue pixels are much less blue -- now they are 25% green and 75% blue. This improves noise performance, but noticably reduces color accuracy for subjects that have blue spectra. But perhaps the blue change is more pleasing, even though it's less accurate.


    I think a more likely explanation is just newer raw converter software changes. If so, it would be possible to get the exact same zero-corrections printing from the 5D2.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Planet Earth
    Posts
    3,114
    Quote Originally Posted by Daniel Browning View Post
    and/or placebo effect. .
    Daniel

    I have to know, was the Nikon D800 able to produce that effect?

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Vancouver, Washington, USA
    Posts
    1,956
    Quote Originally Posted by HDNitehawk View Post
    I have to know, was the Nikon D800 able to produce that effect?
    No, it creates a reality distortion field. I don't just *think* it's better. It actually *is* better. But only within 10 feet of the camera. For everyone outside of the field, it's worse.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Riverside, CA
    Posts
    1,275
    Quote Originally Posted by HDNitehawk View Post
    Daniel

    I have to know, was the Nikon D800 able to produce that effect?
    Ha ha! I laughed out loud at that.

  5. #5
    Senior Member jks_photo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    173
    @ DB will try using current DPP to process my olr 5dII raw to check if I can get same results.... THANKS DB your posts are always so enlingtening.....

  6. #6
    Senior Member jks_photo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    173
    Quote Originally Posted by Daniel Browning View Post
    I'm glad you're getting good results. There are only three possible explanations for what you see: spectral QE changes in the CFA, updated raw converter software, and/or placebo effect. According to DxO tests, the primary change that Canon made to the CFA from the 5D2->5D3 is that the blue pixels are much less blue -- now they are 25% green and 75% blue. This improves noise performance, but noticably reduces color accuracy for subjects that have blue spectra. But perhaps the blue change is more pleasing, even though it's less accurate.


    I think a more likely explanation is just newer raw converter software changes. If so, it would be possible to get the exact same zero-corrections printing from the 5D2.
    Hi DB I tried converting my old 5DII raw files using the latest DPP i used in converting my 5DIII files..... they stilll needed correcting during print so I guess results I'm getting with 5DIII files are not due to raw converters.....

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •