Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 27

Thread: canon 50mm 1.4 vs sigma 50mm 1.4 vs zeiss 50mm 1.4

  1. #11
    Moderator Steve U's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    1,942
    If I had the 24-70 mk2, I would have the Zeiss 50, but I don't so i would probably go for the Canon 50/1.2 as the length of that lens lends itself to AF. 50mm and 85mm I would use for people shots and fast AF is very helpful and the 50/1.2 is fast and accurate and wiiiide.
    At 35mm and 21mm the Zeiss wins hands-down for me.
    Steve U
    Wine, Food and Photography Student and Connoisseur

  2. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Big Mouse Florida
    Posts
    1,178
    No mention of Leica?
    If you see me with a wrench, call 911

  3. #13
    Moderator Steve U's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    1,942
    Never even held a Leica, but i do own and love me Zeiss.
    Steve U
    Wine, Food and Photography Student and Connoisseur

  4. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by Steve U View Post
    If I had the 24-70 mk2, I would have the Zeiss 50, but I don't so i would probably go for the Canon 50/1.2 as the length of that lens lends itself to AF. 50mm and 85mm I would use for people shots and fast AF is very helpful and the 50/1.2 is fast and accurate and wiiiide.
    At 35mm and 21mm the Zeiss wins hands-down for me.
    I have never used manual focusing till now, is it easy or does it needs to be mastered before getting zeiss?

  5. #15
    Also read complaints from several users regarding back focusing issue for ef 50mm 1.2

  6. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by HDNitehawk View Post
    How about this lens;
    http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produc...Planar_ZE.html

    gandhi; In an earlier post you were debating between the 35mm F/1.4 and a 50mm. This lens is in the price range of the 35mm L and I think it might be the best choice.

    Thoughts any one? I could use a good 50mm as well.
    I already have EF 24mm f/1.4L II USM so I want to get the 50mm

  7. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Planet Earth
    Posts
    3,110
    Quote Originally Posted by gandhi View Post
    I already have EF 24mm f/1.4L II USM so I want to get the 50mm
    The link was to the Zeiss 50mm F/2, it was the lens I was referring to.

  8. #18
    Moderator Steve U's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    1,942
    Quote Originally Posted by gandhi View Post
    I have never used manual focusing till now, is it easy or does it needs to be mastered before getting zeiss?
    Zeiss has a fairly long focus throw, so they are relatively easy to manual focus.
    Back focus with 50/1.2 is not an issue if further than a metre away, I have never shot closer than that with it.
    These 5 are all great lenses with superior IQ. The two (2) Zeiss are MF and very different and both very good.
    Because I have a few 77mm filters and you would also have a few already owning the 24mm, the Sigma offers great IQ and the same filter size and is probably best value for money for you.
    Steve U
    Wine, Food and Photography Student and Connoisseur

  9. #19
    Senior Member thekingb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Milwaukee, WI
    Posts
    512
    What you shoot is a big part of the MF AF debate. Still subjects and time to compose and focus? MF isn't a big issue. Otherwise I found MF to be a big hindrance. On my Zeiss 35/2, which I sold, the shots were AMAZING when I got the focus right - which was not often enough when trying to shoot anything moving. The keeper rate was too low for me to justify keeping the lens.

  10. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Planet Earth
    Posts
    3,110
    After reading this thread and reading up on the 50mm lenses, I am thinking about giving the Zeiss 50mm F/2 Makro Planar a go. I think with its close minimum focus distance and sharpness wide open it could be a very creative fun lens to own. The choice would be a new one from B&H for $1,283 or a used one from LensRentals.com for $1,025.

    Steve; I appreciate your thoughts, I'm not much of a people shooter and I don't think the AF will be a big issue for what I like to do. Which brings up another thought, you use Manual Focus lenses with the new 5D III. When I went from the 5D II and 7D to the 1D IV I noticed that it is much easier to manual focus with the 1D IV, it seems to have a better clearer view and more light. Does the 5D III seem better than the 5D II for manual focus?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •