Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: 70-200 f2.8 non IS or 70-200 f2.8 IS version I for weddings/portraits

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Administrator Sean Setters's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Savannah, GA
    Posts
    3,361
    I'd agree that the IS version is likely a better fit for your needs--image stabilization is huge help when trying to hand-hold a camera in dimly lit churches. That said, you could get the same benefit by using a monopod with the non-IS version, but your mobility would suffer.

  2. #2
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    4
    @w349: indeed weather sealing, didn't think of before but very, very useful

    @neuroanatomist: when the 5D3 becomes less expensive, I'm indeed planning on buying it.

    Does anyone have experience with these lenses in the field (or with both of them). I really love the IQ from the IS version II, but I can't compare it to the two lenses mentioned here, which are said to have a lower IQ. Should I be afraid I will be dissappointed or just go for it ??
    5D | 24-70 f2.8 | 50 f1.8 | 580EXII | 55-200

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •